It’s that time again!
The nominees for biggest weasels of 2005 are posted on www.dilbert.com [no longer available].
Vote now. It’s your chance to embarrass the weasels who most annoyed you during the past year.
At first glance, there seems to be an imbalance of Republicans on the list. That’s because you usually have to do something to be nominated. And Democrats haven’t done much this year, either weasel or non-weasel. The Democrats who did make the list are accused of not doing enough about hurricane Katrina. That’s what people mean when they talk about the exception that proves the rule.
In case you’re wondering, I have no coherent political views of my own. The only thing I know for sure is that I don’t have the information I need to make decisions. That’s the problem with having a degree in economics. Until I ruined my worldview with education, I saw the world in terms of things that worked and things that didn’t. Now when something works well, and the rest of the world is applauding it, I wonder how much better it could have been if we did it the other way. And when a policy turns out to be a huge disaster, I wonder how much worse it would have been if the other side got their way. So let’s all agree that I shouldn’t be voting.
This year, in the country category of the nomination list, Iraq is included as part of the United States. That’s just a temporary thing until the CIA rigs their elections and they appear to have a democracy. Or until the United States claims success, withdraws and plunges Iraq into 100 years of civil war. Or until everything works out fine and they have a thriving economy and a free society. (Stupid economics degree!)
Anyway, I have no opinion. Yours are welcome.